Fascination About h4831sc load data
Fascination About h4831sc load data
Blog Article
This can be imagined to be the "head to" powder-or darn near to it- for nearly any bottle-necked cartridge one could handload. It's the inspiration for so many pet loads, but I have not been happy with the final results.
Not surprisingly, the Hodgdon tech would not endorse my mixing of different large amount quantities, but I think I understand why. It is a litigation-driven globe, and some fool would certainly deduce that he could mix H380 and H110 and think of his very own custom made mixture of powder. What a planet.
WARNING: This item can expose you to Lead, which is known towards the State of California to cause most cancers and birth defects or other reproductive harm. For more information go to – .
Run your load up with the specific powder (sc or frequent) and lot you are utilizing although. Exact same burn up price does not imply it can behave "particularly" a similar. I have witnessed above 100 fps difference between sc and mil-surp a great deal of H4831.
Beginner to reloading. This will be used for a 300wsm with 215 bergers. I was capable to get my fingers on a couple lbs . of h4831.
Apache Jct Fantastic information, I've jars of each and generally wondered if they could be reloaded While using the exact same recipes ought to I operate out of 1 or the other.
NBTs or Hornady VMax, but have a limited source of Varget, and h4831sc load data also a whole lot far more obtainable H4831SC. I shoot 55 gr. loads Just about exclusively, because that is exactly what the rifles shoot the most effective.
excaliber stated: I've h4831sc located the exact opposite to generally be legitimate in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with a hundred and eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably quicker and equally correct powder in my 300 Win Mag.
I have located the exact reverse for being true in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with a hundred and eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a much faster and equally precise powder in my three hundred Win Mag.
Ballistically, this Serious Extruded powder is the exact duplicate of H4831. Bodily, it has a shorter grain dimensions, thus, the designation SC or brief Slice. The shorter, much more compact kernels enable the powder to flow with the powder steps much more efficiently, helping to alleviate the consistent cutting of granules.
Regardless of the similarity in nomenclature, They are wholly different powders, with IMR 4831 becoming substantially more quickly as opposed to Hodgdon variants. Do not deal with them as the identical powder, because they most undoubtedly will not be.
The "SC" means Brief Cut. I have never found a difference between possibly powder dut I do not think I would mix them.
arkansas or ohio i hardly ever discovered a distinction other than the standard is like rolling cordwood onto the the h4831sc pan.
I found that my 7mag 160 partitions had been sub MOA with 4831sc with low to min charges. I’m chatting 2700 (possibly 2800) fps, it was a small 60s grain cost inside a Norma circumstance. Not what I used to be trying to find, but accurate Even so.